1                                       INTRODUCTION

1.1                                 Background

1.1.1.1                     The proposed Sludge Treatment Facilities (STF) are designed to treat 2,000 wet tonnes/day of the dewatered sludge generated after the sewage treatment process in the Stonecutters Island Sewage Treatment Works (STW) and 10 other regional sewage treatment works (STWs), including the Pillar Point STW, San Wai STW, Sham Tsang STW, Siu Ho Wan STW, Sai Kung STW, Shatin STW, Shek Wu Hui STW, Stanley STW, Tai Po STW and Yuen Long STW, by the fluidized bed incineration technology to substantially reduce the volume of sewage sludge for disposal to the landfill.

1.1.1.2                     The STF is proposed to be located in pulverized fuel ash lagoon area in Tsang Tsui near Nim Wan.  The site is located in the northern part of the East Lagoon, adjacent to the West New Territories (WENT) Landfill and to the northeast of the Black Point Power Station.  The proposed location for the STF is shown in Figure 1.1.

1.1.1.3                     The decommissioning of the northern part of the East Lagoon, construction of the STF and the operation and maintenance of the STF will be implemented under a design-build-operate (DBO) contract arrangement (hereinafter referred to as “the Project”).

1.1.1.4                     The STF is scheduled to be commissioned by end 2012 and has a design life of 20 years.

1.1.1.5                     The Project is classified as a designated project according to the following items of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO):-

(i)            Item G.3 of Part I, Schedule 2 of the EIAO - construction and operation of an incinerator with an installed capacity of more than 50 tonnes per day; and
(ii)          Item 8 of Part II, Schedule 2 of the EIAO - decommissioning of a waste disposal facility for pulverized fuel ash, furnace bottom ash or gypsum.

1.1.1.6                     An environmental permit is required for the implementation of the Project under the EIAO.  The EIA Study Brief (No. ESB-169/2007) for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study for the Project was issued by the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) in October 2007.

1.1.1.7                     Metcalf & Eddy Limited (M&E) was commissioned by the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) of the Hong Kong SAR Government to undertake the Feasibility Study for the development of the STF and its ancillary and supporting facilities (hereinafter referred to as “the Project”).  ENSR Asia (HK) Ltd (ENSR), being the sub-consultant, conducted the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Study for the Project.

1.1.1.8                     The purpose of this EIA report is to provide information on the nature and extent of potential environmental impacts arising from the construction and operation of the proposed STF and related activities taking place concurrently, and to contribute to decisions on the overall environmental acceptability of the Project, after the implementation of the proposed environmental mitigation measures.

1.2                                 Objectives of this EIA Study

1.2.1.1                     According to the EIA Study Brief, the objectives of this EIA study are as follows:-

(i)            to describe the Project and associated works together with the requirements for carrying out the Project;
(ii)          to identify and describe the elements of the community and environment likely to be affected by the Project and/ or likely to cause adverse impacts to the Project, including both the natural and man-made environment;
(iii)         to consider alternatives including, but not limited to, location, designs (including updated technology to be adopted for sludge treatment) and construction methods with a view to avoiding and minimizing the potential environmental impacts; to compare the environmental benefits and dis-benefits of each of the alternatives; to provide reasons for selecting the preferred option(s) and to describe the part of environmental factors played in the selection;
(iv)        to identify and quantify emission sources, to determine the significance of impacts on sensitive receivers and potential affected uses and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;
(v)          to identify and quantify any health impacts and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;
(vi)        to identify and quantify any potential impacts from point and non-point pollution sources on the identified water systems and sensitive receivers and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;
(vii)       to identify any potential landscape and visual impacts and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;
(viii)     to identify and quantify any potential losses or damage and other potential impacts to flora, fauna and natural habitats and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;
(ix)        to identify and quantify waste management requirements and land contamination prevention requirements, and to propose measures to mitigate or prevent impacts;
(x)          to propose the provision of mitigation measures to minimize pollution, environmental disturbance and nuisance during construction and operation of the Project;
(xi)        to investigate the feasibility, practicability, effectiveness and implications of the proposed mitigation measures;
(xii)       to identify, predict and evaluate the residual environmental impacts (i.e. after practicable mitigation) and the cumulative effects expected to arise during the construction and operation phases of the Project in relation to the sensitive receivers and potential affected uses;
(xiii)     to identify, assess and specify methods, measures and standards, to be included in the detailed design, construction and operation of the Project which are necessary to mitigate these environmental impacts and cumulative effects and reduce them to acceptable levels;
(xiv)     to investigate the extent of the secondary environmental impacts that may arise from the proposed mitigation measures and to identify constraints associated with the mitigation measures recommended in the EIA study, as well as the provision of any necessary modification; and
(xv)      to design and specify the environmental monitoring and audit requirements to ensure the implementation of the recommended environmental protection and pollution control measures.

1.3                                 Structure of the Report

1.3.1.1                     The structure of the EIA Report is set out below:-

(i)            Section 2 illustrates the project location and assessment area for the EIA study, and provides a description of the Project highlighting the key infrastructure for the STF and the operation activities.
(ii)          Section 3 identifies and assesses the potential air quality impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Project.
(iii)         Section 4 presents the health risk assessment conducted to assess the potential health impact associated with the operation of the Project.
(iv)        Section 5 identifies and assesses the potential waste management implications associated with the construction and operation of the Project; and land contamination prevention measures for the operation of the Project.
(v)          Section 6 identifies and assesses the potential water pollution impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Project.
(vi)        Section 7 identifies and assesses the potential ecological impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Project.
(vii)       Section 8 assesses the noise impact from the off-site traffic noise generated from the operation of the Project.
(viii)     Section 9 identifies and assesses the potential landscape and visual impacts associated with the Project.
(ix)        Section 10 identifies and assesses the potential landfill gas hazard associated with the Project.
(x)          Section 11 highlights the environmental monitoring and audit (EM&A) requirements for the Project.  Details of the scope and approach are presented in a stand-alone EM&A Manual.
(xi)        Section 12 summarises and concludes the findings of the EIA.